![Cover of A dialoge or communication of two persons: Deuysyd and set forthe in the late[n] tonge, by the noble and famose clarke. Desiderius Erasmus intituled [the] pylgremage of pure deuotyon. Newly tra[n]slatyd into Englishe](https://cdn.myebooksbuy.com/c/a-dialoge-or-communication-of-two-persons-deuysyd-and-set-forthe-in-the.webp)
Free summary
A dialoge or communication of two persons: Deuysyd and set forthe in the late[n] tonge, by the noble and famose clarke. Desiderius Erasmus intituled [the] pylgremage of pure deuotyon. Newly tra[n]slatyd into Englishe
Desiderius Erasmus (1469–1536)
A skeptical traveler and his homebound friend debate the value of visiting holy shrines, revealing a sharp, early-modern critique of religious excess and performative piety.
In Short
This dialogue captures a restless, intellectually curious age through the eyes of Ogygius, a man who has traveled to famous pilgrimage sites in England, and Menedemus, a grounded man who prefers the "stations" of his own home. Through their lively, often biting conversation, the text interrogates the obsession with physical relics and the exploitation of the faithful. It has endured as a masterwork of Renaissance humanism, blending deep piety with an unflinching, satirical examination of the institutional corruption and superstitions that defined the landscape of the sixteenth-century church.
The Story
The conversation begins with Menedemus greeting Ogygius, who has just returned from visiting the shrines of St. James and Our Lady of Walsingham. Menedemus is immediately skeptical of the spiritual benefits of these long, arduous journeys. Ogygius recounts his experiences with a mixture of genuine awe and detached irony, describing the sensory details of the shrines—the cold, wooden statues, the smell of candles, and the overwhelming, often bizarre, variety of relics on display. He describes how the shrines are managed by figures whose devotion seems inextricably tied to financial gain.
As they speak, the narrative arc shifts from a simple travelogue to a broader philosophical debate. Ogygius details the "miracles" he witnessed, such as a knight saved by a miraculous gate, while Menedemus persistently challenges the validity of these tales. They discuss the "New Learning" that is sweeping through the world, which has led many pilgrims to visit shrines only to offer nothing, questioning why their money should not go to the poor instead. Ogygius, though a participant in these pilgrimages, does not shy away from the absurdity of the claims made by the shrine keepers, such as the presentation of a vial of the Virgin Mary's milk, which is described as being as solidified as chalk.
The climax of their discussion centers on Ogygius’s visit to the tomb of St. Thomas, where he is granted access to secret relics by the Archbishop. Even here, the tension between the sacred and the profane is palpable. A companion, Gratian, openly scoffs at the relics, showing his disdain for the veneration of old, dusty rags and shoes. Ogygius finds himself caught between his desire to respect the holy site and his own growing realization that the spectacle often masks a moral void. He reflects on how the wealth amassed by these churches contrasts sharply with the poverty of the people lying right outside their walls.
By the end of the dialogue, the initial contrast between the traveler and the homebody collapses. Menedemus describes his own "stations of Rome"—a routine of caring for his children, managing his shop, and tending to his household duties. He argues that his daily life is a form of worship that requires no travel or costly relics. Ogygius, having seen the world, is left to consider this alternative. The dialogue concludes not with a conversion of one to the other, but with a shared understanding that the most profound duty of a person is to act with integrity and kindness in their own immediate surroundings.
How It Unfolds
The traveler returns Ogygius arrives home, weary from his journeys, and is immediately met with pointed questions from Menedemus about whether his pilgrimage provided any actual spiritual improvement. The tension between the necessity of travel and the value of staying home is established at once.
The anatomy of the shrine Ogygius describes the physical reality of the sites, noting the decline in offerings and the odd, business-like nature of the canons who manage the collections. He highlights the strange, often contradictory, stories told about the Virgin Mary and the relics kept in the local churches.
The debate of relics The conversation turns to specific wonders, such as the Virgin’s milk and the miraculous gate of Walsingham, as Menedemus pushes for logical explanations. Ogygius admits that while he finds meaning in these things, he is not blind to the greed of the men who maintain them.
The secret treasures Ogygius recounts his privileged access to the inner sanctums of St. Thomas, where he and his companion Gratian encounter the uncomfortable reality of performative piety. Gratian’s mocking behavior serves as a mirror for the reader’s own doubts, highlighting the absurdity of venerating objects of questionable origin.
The domestic resolution Menedemus reclaims the value of his own labor, defining his domestic life as his own pilgrimage. The dialogue settles into a quiet, mutual agreement that the highest form of devotion is found in the service of one’s family and neighbors.
The People
Ogygius is the archetypal wanderer, a man whose curiosity drives him to seek out the divine in distant, physical manifestations. He is a sophisticated observer, capable of describing the grandeur of a temple and the pettiness of its keepers in the same breath. He enters the conversation as a defender of traditional piety, yet he ends it as a man whose faith has been refined by the skepticism of his friend.
Menedemus serves as the moral anchor of the dialogue. He is blunt, practical, and deeply rooted in his domestic responsibilities. He wants to know why a man would leave his family and his duties to seek God in a distant land when he could find the same purpose at home. He is not anti-religious; rather, he is anti-superstitious, demanding that faith be measured by its effects on a person’s character and their treatment of others.
Gratian appears as the catalyst for the most intense moments of the dialogue. He is the voice of the unapologetic critic, a man who finds the veneration of "secret" relics to be inherently ridiculous. He acts as a foil to Ogygius’s more diplomatic approach, forcing the keepers of the shrines to confront their own potential frauds and exposing the fragility of their carefully curated mysteries.
In Its Own Voice
"But this new learnynge, whiche runnythe all the world ouer now a dayes, dothe cause hym to be vysytyd moche lesse than he was wontyd to be."
Ogygius explains to Menedemus why the old pilgrimage sites are falling into decline.
"The most acceptable honor, that thou canste doo to her is to folowe her lyuynge."
Ogygius admits to Menedemus that true devotion is not in the outward ritual, but in the internal imitation of the saint.
What It's Really About
At its heart, this work is a critique of the commodification of the sacred. It asks whether God is more present in a golden reliquary or in the life of a neighbor. The text moves beyond a simple rejection of pilgrimage to a deeper inquiry into the nature of true devotion, contrasting the "dead" religion of material objects with the "living" religion of ethics and duty. It poses a fundamental question for the reader: is the essence of faith found in the journey to a holy place, or is it found in the simple, often difficult work of living justly where you are?
Why Read It Today
Readers who enjoy the biting wit of Swift or the moral clarity of Montaigne will find a familiar spirit here. The book is an essential bridge between the medieval obsession with holy relics and the modern focus on individual conscience. It captures the exact moment when the Western mind began to look inward for spiritual authority rather than outward at institutions.
However, one must be prepared for the challenge of the period’s language. The early English prose, with its idiosyncratic spelling and archaic structures, requires patience; it is not a book to be skimmed. You must sit with the text, letting the rhythm of the debate wash over you. It is also an honest look at a time when religious and social hierarchies were being openly questioned. You will find that the attitudes expressed—the frustration with performative virtue and the suspicion of institutional greed—feel remarkably contemporary. What stays with you long after the final page is the image of the "stations of Rome" in a home parlor; it is a powerful reminder that the most sacred work we do is often the most mundane, and that our greatest pilgrimages are the ones we undertake every day in the service of those we love.
This summary was written by AI (gemini-3.1-flash-lite) on 2026-08-30 and is a guide to the book, not a replacement for it — it can be incomplete or wrong. The book itself is public domain. Copyright & AI disclosure · Report a problem





